SC issues stringent guidelines to prevent student suicides in colleges across India
SC issues stringent guidelines to prevent student suicides in colleges across India

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has issued a series of urgent and wide-ranging directions to address the alarming rise in student suicides in Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs) across the country, stressing that universities and colleges must take immediate and proactive responsibility for student welfare.

A Bench comprising Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan passed the directions while hearing a petition filed by the parents of two IIT Delhi students, who allegedly died by suicide due to caste-based discrimination and intense academic pressure. The Court made it mandatory for institutions to promptly register a First Information Report (FIR) in the event of a student’s suicide.

Expressing deep concern, the Court observed that delays in scholarship disbursement, inadequate mental health support systems, excessive academic pressure, discrimination, and administrative lapses are key contributors to the crisis. It referred to the findings of the National Task Force (NTF), constituted on March 24, 2025, to examine mental health challenges and suicide trends among students in higher education.

Based on the NTF’s recommendations, the Supreme Court directed the following measures:

Centralised data collection

Maintain accurate and centralised data on suicides among students aged 15–29 years under the Sample Registration System, with assistance from public health and demographic experts.

Clear categorisation of data: Ensure that the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) distinctly categorises school students and higher education students in its annual suicide statistics.

Mandatory police reporting

Immediately report every case of student suicide or unnatural death to the police, irrespective of whether it occurs on campus, in hostels, paying guest accommodations, or elsewhere, and regardless of the mode of study-regular, distance, or online.

Annual reporting to regulators

Submit an annual report of all such cases to the University Grants Commission (UGC) and other relevant regulatory bodies, including AICTE, NMC, DCI, and BCI. In the case of Central Universities and Institutes of National Importance, reports must be submitted to the Department of Higher Education.

Round-the-clock medical care

Ensure that all residential HEIs have 24×7 access to qualified medical assistance, either on campus or within a one-kilometre radius.

Faculty recruitment

Fill all vacant teaching and non-teaching posts within four months, prioritising positions reserved for marginalised and underrepresented communities, including persons with disabilities. Special recruitment drives must be conducted where necessary.

Administrative appointments

Appoint Vice Chancellors, Registrars, and other key administrative officers within four months. As a standard practice, such vacancies should be filled within one month of arising. Institutions must annually report details of reserved posts, vacancies, and reasons for delays to the Central and State Governments.

Scholarship disbursement

Clear all pending scholarship payments within four months. If delays occur, institutions must inform students and authorities of the reasons within two months. Future scholarship disbursements must follow fixed timelines, and students must not be penalised for administrative delays. No student may be barred from examinations, classes, hostels, or have documents withheld due to delayed scholarships.

Compliance with UGC norms

Strictly enforce all binding UGC regulations, including those related to ragging, discrimination, sexual harassment, and student grievance redressal. Ensure that all mandatory committees and grievance redressal mechanisms function effectively.

Suicide prevention framework

Adopt a comprehensive “Suicide Prevention and Postvention Protocol,” as recommended by the National Task Force, to address issues such as ragging, harassment, discrimination, and post-incident support.

The Supreme Court cautioned that any failure to comply with these directions would attract serious legal consequences, underscoring that safeguarding students’ lives and mental well-being is a non-negotiable responsibility of educational institutions.

Quick Links

© Rehaab Media Online. All Rights Reserved.